Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
William E. Weiss
Call For A Free Initial Consultation 888-MC-CRASH 415-362-6765

Recent Blog Posts

boat-accident-sinking-in-the-sea

Boat Accident Injuries

By William E. Weiss | Posted on October 16, 2026

William E. Weiss, Attorney at Law, handles injury claims involving pleasure craft and small vessels. Boating accidents can cause serious injuries, including fractures, head injuries, burns, and lacerations caused by boat propellers. In the most tragic cases, these accidents result in death. On California rivers and in the Delta, boating accidents often occur on… Read More »

a-devastating-traffic-collision-scene-showing-a-damaged-motorcycle-after-a-severe-accident-with-a-car-

Motorcycle Accident vs. Car Accident Claims: Why the Legal Strategy Must Be Different

By William E. Weiss | Posted on October 15, 2026

Motorcycle accidents and car accidents can both result in serious injuries, expensive medical bills, and complicated insurance disputes. However, motorcycle accident claims often present challenges that do not arise in the same way in typical car accident cases. Riders have less physical protection, frequently suffer more severe injuries, and may face unfair assumptions about… Read More »

collision-between-motorcycle-and-car-on-the-road

How Negligent Drivers Cause Motorcycle Crashes: Common Scenarios and What Riders Should Know

By William E. Weiss | Posted on July 15, 2026

Motorcycle riders in the Bay Area know that riding requires constant awareness. Whether navigating city streets in San Francisco, commuting on Interstate 80, or enjoying the winding roads of Marin County, bikers must anticipate hazards that drivers of passenger vehicles rarely encounter. Unfortunately, even the most experienced and safety-conscious rider cannot always avoid a… Read More »

two wooden blocks labeled Uninsured and Motorist, stacked on a wooden table against an red background. The image conveys insurance gaps, risk on the road, and driver protection.

Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Why Every Bay Area Rider Should Have It

By William E. Weiss | Posted on June 25, 2026

Motorcycle riders face unique risks every time they get on the road. Unlike occupants of passenger vehicles, riders have little protection when a collision occurs, and the injuries that result are often severe. While a collision cannot always be avoided, too many motorcyclists overlook one of the most valuable forms of protection available after… Read More »

Road accident or traffic stop scene at night focusing on the illuminated rear tail light of a stopped vehicle.

Should You Record a Police Stop? Know the Law in California

By William E. Weiss | Posted on May 29, 2026

For many motorcycle riders, a traffic stop can feel tense from the moment the patrol lights come on. In some cases, riders may worry about being profiled, unfairly questioned, or subjected to unlawful searches or arrests. Video recordings of police encounters have become an important tool for documenting what actually happened during a stop,… Read More »

Photo of car, helmet and motorcycle on the road, the concept of road accidents.

Common Motorcycle Accident Injuries and What They Mean for Your Claim

By William E. Weiss | Posted on April 27, 2026

Motorcycle accidents often result in far more serious injuries than typical car crashes. Without the protection of a vehicle frame, airbags, or seatbelts, riders absorb the full force of impact. Even a relatively low-speed collision can lead to significant physical harm, long recovery times, and lasting consequences. For injured motorcyclists in the San Francisco… Read More »

Scared shocked young woman having trouble on road, opening automobile door and looking back, having problem

What Happens When a Car Occupant Opens a Door Into a Passing Motorcycle’s Path?

By William E. Weiss | Posted on March 27, 2026

One of the most dangerous hazards a motorcyclist can face on California roads is the sudden opening of a car door into a lane of traffic, a scenario commonly known as a “dooring.” Even at relatively low speeds, striking an open door can throw a rider from their bike, cause severe injuries, or result… Read More »

Understanding Comparative Fault in California Motorcycle Crash Cases After a motorcycle accident in California, one of the first legal concepts that may arise is “comparative fault.” Insurance companies frequently bring it up, and it can significantly affect how much compensation an injured rider ultimately recovers. Unfortunately, in motorcycle crash cases, comparative fault is often misused to unfairly reduce payouts. Understanding how the rule works—and how it should properly be applied—is critical for protecting your rights. At William E. Weiss, Attorney at Law, we represent motorcycle riders throughout the San Francisco Bay Area who have been injured due to negligent drivers. We know how comparative fault arguments are raised in San Francisco motorcycle crashes, and we know how to challenge attempts to shift responsibility away from careless motorists. What Is Comparative Fault Under California Law? California follows a “pure comparative negligence” system. This means that if both parties share blame for an accident, the injury victim only receives proportional compensation that reflects the other party’s level of fault. For example, if a jury determines that a negligent driver caused a motorcycle crash but assigns a percentage of fault to the rider, the total damages awarded are reduced by that percentage. So, if a plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault for a $100,000 injury, they can only recover $80,000 (80%) of their damages. Unlike some states that bar recovery if a party is 50% or more than 50% at fault, California allows injured individuals to recover damages even if their fault is greater than 50%. The focus is on allocating responsibility fairly based on evidence and holding negligent drivers accountable for the damage they caused through their negligence. In theory, comparative fault is a neutral legal doctrine designed to allocate damages proportionally. In practice, however, it often becomes a strategic tool used by insurance companies to reduce what they must pay, especially in motorcycle accident claims. Why Comparative Fault Comes Up So Often in Motorcycle Cases Motorcycle crashes frequently involve severe injuries and substantial damages. Because the financial exposure is high, insurers search for ways to minimize payouts. One common approach is to suggest that the rider’s conduct contributed to the collision, even when the primary cause was a driver’s negligence. Motorcyclists are particularly vulnerable to these arguments because of persistent stereotypes about riding behavior. Claims that a rider was “going too fast,” “came out of nowhere,” or was “hard to see” are often used to justify shifting a percentage of fault. These assertions must be evaluated carefully and tested against objective evidence. Comparative fault should never be based on assumptions about motorcycles. It must be grounded in provable facts, traffic laws, and physical evidence from the crash scene. How Insurance Companies Attempt to Inflate Fault Percentages Insurance adjusters and defense attorneys may attempt to increase the rider’s assigned fault in several ways: • By relying heavily on the at-fault driver’s version of events. • By selectively interpreting skid marks, vehicle positioning, or damage patterns. • By emphasizing generalized claims about visibility or reaction time without expert support. • By mischaracterizing normal riding behavior as reckless. Even a modest percentage increase can substantially reduce a compensation award. For example, in a serious injury case involving six-figure damages, a 20% allocation of fault could mean tens of thousands of dollars less in recovery. Because of this financial impact, comparative fault disputes are often central to motorcycle crash litigation. Evidence Matters More Than Allegations The allocation of fault in a motorcycle accident case should be based on concrete evidence, not speculation. This may include traffic camera footage, dashcam recordings, eyewitness testimony, event data recorder information, intersection sightline analysis, and accident reconstruction reports. In many cases, physical evidence contradicts a driver’s claim that the rider was at fault. The point of impact, braking distances, and vehicle damage patterns often reveal which party failed to yield, changed lanes unsafely, or violated traffic signals. An experienced motorcycle accident attorney ensures that this evidence is preserved early and presented clearly. We often seek to obtain video from security cameras where we see their presence at the accident scene. When vehicles, such as Teslas, have video cameras on when they are involved in an incident, we work to obtain that video and put the insurance company on notice that the video must be preserved as part of the claim process. Once inaccurate fault assumptions appear in a police report or insurance file, they can influence the entire case. Early intervention is critical. Comparative Fault Does Not Change Driver Responsibilities It is important to remember that California drivers have a legal duty to operate their vehicles safely, remain attentive, and yield when required by law. That duty does not diminish because the other vehicle is a motorcycle. Courts evaluate whether each party met their legal obligations under traffic statutes and general negligence principles. A driver who turns left in front of an oncoming motorcycle, changes lanes without checking mirrors, or merges without yielding cannot avoid responsibility simply by raising comparative fault arguments. The legal analysis focuses on conduct, not on vehicle type. How Comparative Fault Affects Settlement Negotiations Most motorcycle accident cases resolve through negotiated settlements rather than trial. During settlement discussions, insurers frequently reference comparative fault as leverage to justify lower offers. They may argue that a jury could assign a percentage of fault to the rider, even if the evidence supporting that claim is weak. This is where experienced legal representation becomes essential. A lawyer who understands motorcycle dynamics, roadway engineering, and injury biomechanics can push back effectively against exaggerated fault claims. By presenting a strong liability case, it becomes much more difficult for insurers to justify reductions. When necessary, taking a case to litigation signals that unsupported comparative fault allegations will not be accepted. Why Legal Advocacy Is Especially Important for Riders Motorcycle accident cases are different from car accident cases. The injuries are often more severe, the property damage more dramatic, and the stakes higher. Because of this, insurers invest significant resources into defending these claims and minimizing exposure. At William E. Weiss, Attorney at Law, we understand both the legal framework of comparative negligence and the practical tactics used in motorcycle crash litigation. We work to ensure that fault assessments are fair, evidence-based, and consistent with California law. Our approach is thorough, strategic, and focused on protecting injured riders from improper reductions in compensation. Protecting Your Recovery After a Bay Area Motorcycle Crash If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident in the San Francisco Bay Area, comparative fault may become part of your case whether you expect it or not. The key is making sure it is applied correctly and not used as a tool to undervalue your claim. William E. Weiss has decades of experience representing motorcyclists and successfully challenging attempts to unfairly shift blame. If you are facing questions about liability after a crash, contact our office for a free consultation. We will review the facts of your case, explain how comparative fault may apply, and fight to secure the full compensation you deserve under California law.

Understanding Comparative Fault in California Motorcycle Crash Cases

By William E. Weiss | Posted on March 6, 2026

After a motorcycle accident in California, one of the first legal concepts that may arise is “comparative fault.” Insurance companies frequently bring it up, and it can significantly affect how much compensation an injured rider ultimately recovers. Unfortunately, in motorcycle crash cases, comparative fault is often misused to unfairly reduce payouts. Understanding how the… Read More »

Crash on the road. Close up of a motorcycle accident on the road

What to Do in the First 48 Hours After a Motorcycle or Car Crash in California

By William E. Weiss | Posted on December 26, 2025

The first 48 hours after a motorcycle or car crash are chaotic, stressful, and often physically overwhelming. Yet those same two days are also the most critical period for protecting your health, your legal rights, and your ability to pursue full financial recovery. Evidence is fragile, memories fade quickly, and insurance companies begin positioning… Read More »

Lone motorbike rider on the expressway

Why Motorcycle Riders Deserve Equal Protection on California Roads

By William E. Weiss | Posted on October 3, 2025

Motorcycle riders in California face unique risks on the road, and those risks extend far beyond the physical dangers of a crash. While car and truck drivers are largely protected by safety features and societal assumptions of responsibility, motorcyclists often encounter bias, misunderstanding, and unequal treatment—whether dealing with insurance companies or interacting with law… Read More »

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2015 - 2026 William E. Weiss. All rights reserved.
Custom WebShop™ law firm website design by NextClient.com.

Contact Form Tab